Friday, 31 July 2009
Tuesday, 28 July 2009
Saturday, 25 July 2009
Emirates Pilot Tells Story About A340 Tail Strike
Officials say it was the closest thing Australia has had to a major air catastrophe, and after 4 months of silence, the pilot has finally told his story to the Australia Herald Sun...
The A340 was fully loaded with 257 passengers and 18 crew on board. As it approached the end of the runway of Melbourne Airport on its takeoff roll, the pilot knew they were not fast enough to provide the required lift. He pushed the engines to 'Take Off And Go-Around' power and rotated, bouncing the tail of the Airbus three times off the pavement and hitting the REIL lights at the end of the runway as the airplane finally became airborne. After 30 minutes dumping fuel over Port Phillip Bay, they returned to Melbourne and landed safely, but the Emirates pilot was badly shaken.
The pilot said he still doesn't know exactly how he managed to get the Airbus in the air. "I . . . sort of reacted on instinct," he told the Herald Sun. "I had a feeling that (something) wasn't working, but I couldn't find out what was wrong. I knew I couldn't stop. At that point I knew we just had to go. And we got it off the ground, miraculously."Safety investigators found that the First Officer was flying the plane when the Captain called "Rotate". When it failed to fly, he called "Rotate" again, which caused the first tail strike. It was then that he pushed the plane to Take Off and Go-Around power and hit the tail again as they became airborne. Once off the ground, they realized that the calculated departure weight was 100 tons lighter than the actual weight of the airplane. While the crew is not responsible for entering the takeoff weight, they are responsible for checking that it is correct. The typo meant incorrect calculations of takeoff power and requisite speeds. According to the Herald Sun, the pilot has left Dubai with his family and returned to Europe, where he is from. He reportedly had slept only 3 1/2 hours in the 24 before he was scheduled to fly, and both he and the co-pilot were handed prepared letters of resignation when they returned to Dubai after the incident. There were four pilots on board the aircraft, including two relief pilots, due to the 14 1/2 hour length of the flight from Melbourne to Dubai.Officials say it was the closest thing Australia has had to a major air catastrophe, and after 4 months of silence, the pilot has finally told his story to the Australia Herald Sun...The A340 was fully loaded with 257 passengers and 18 crew on board. As it approached the end of the runway of Melbourne Airport on its takeoff roll, the pilot knew they were not fast enough to provide the required lift. He pushed the engines to 'Take Off And Go-Around' power and rotated, bouncing the tail of the Airbus three times off the pavement and hitting the REIL lights at the end of the runway as the airplane finally became airborne. After 30 minutes dumping fuel over Port Phillip Bay, they returned to Melbourne and landed safely, but the Emirates pilot was badly shaken. The pilot said he still doesn't know exactly how he managed to get the Airbus in the air. "I . . . sort of reacted on instinct," he told the Herald Sun. "I had a feeling that (something) wasn't working, but I couldn't find out what was wrong. I knew I couldn't stop. At that point I knew we just had to go. And we got it off the ground, miraculously."Safety investigators found that the First Officer was flying the plane when the Captain called "Rotate". When it failed to fly, he called "Rotate" again, which caused the first tail strike. It was then that he pushed the plane to Take Off and Go-Around power and hit the tail again as they became airborne. Once off the ground, they realized that the calculated departure weight was 100 tons lighter than the actual weight of the airplane. While the crew is not responsible for entering the takeoff weight, they are responsible for checking that it is correct. The typo meant incorrect calculations of takeoff power and requisite speeds.
According to the Herald Sun, the pilot has left Dubai with his family and returned to Europe, where he is from. He reportedly had slept only 3 1/2 hours in the 24 before he was scheduled to fly, and both he and the co-pilot were handed prepared letters of resignation when they returned to Dubai after the incident. There were four pilots on board the aircraft, including two relief pilots, due to the 14 1/2 hour length of the flight from Melbourne to Dubai.
Labels: Flight Crew, Serious Incident
AF447: Loss of contact opens rift between Brazil and Senegal
Circumstances of the loss - close to the Brazil-Senegal oceanic airspace boundary, where responsibility for the flight is handed over - have made the transfer issue a sensitive matter. France's Bureau d'Enquetes et d'Analyses (BEA) states that the flight "was not transferred" between Brazil's Atlantico and Senegal's Dakar oceanic centres. This has been backed by West African air navigation service ASECNA.
But the Brazilian air force says it wants to "eliminate doubts" about the procedures followed. It has publicly issued an audio segment of the moment the Atlantico controller co-ordinated transfer of AF447 to Dakar, when the A330 was estimating reaching the Brazil-Senegal airspace boundary - the waypoint designated TASIL - at 02:20UTC. Only changes in excess of 3min to this estimated time would have required further co-ordination with Dakar. But the estimate was never revised because the Atlantico controller could not raise AF447 after the last radio contact at 01:35UTC.
As a result, argues the air force, Dakar "theoretically" assumed control of the aircraft at 02:20UTC. But in a statement ASECNA claims the "onus" was on the Atlantico controller to call his counterpart at Dakar centre to confirm the aircraft's arrival at the airspace boundary. "This formality was not performed," it says, and the aircraft did not contact Dakar to "signal its presence".
ASECNA rejects as "totally unfounded" the Brazilian suggestion that aircraft can be assumed to have entered Dakar airspace if the Dakar centre does not warn otherwise. But BEA's interim report into the crash highlights a September 2008 agreement between the Atlantico and Dakar centres which was in force at the time of the crash.
This states that air crews must contact the receiving sector controller 5min before the airspace boundary, but also that controllers in the receiving sector must inform the exiting sector if they cannot establish contact with an aircraft within 3min of the estimated time of arrival.
BEA warns against drawing early conclusions over the search and rescue situation, stating that its chronology of subsequent air traffic control communications is "still fragmentary".
But the interim report states that Dakar controllers worked with a 'virtual' track of AF447 in the absence of radio contact and a confirmed trajectory. There was no log-on to the Dakar automatic dependent surveillance tracking system. Some 28 minutes after the estimated entry of AF447 into Dakar oceanic airspace, the Dakar controller informed the adjacent centre, Cape Verde Sal, that the aircraft had not yet made contact. More than an hour later, at 03:54UTC, with AF447 running 9min behind the projected time to enter Sal airspace, Sal called Dakar for an update, and was told that AF447 had not contacted Dakar to revise its estimates.Sal informed Dakar at 04:07UTC that it was tracking a second Air France flight, AF459, which had been some 37min behind AF447. This second aircraft failed to raise AF447 on the radio. At 04:21UTC Dakar called Atlantico centre to confirm the whether AF447 had exited Brazilian airspace at TASIL in line with the original estimate.
BEA's partial chronology does not yet include full information from the Atlantico and Sal centres. But the Brazilian air force states that, after Dakar queried AF447's position with Atlantico, the Recife-based Salvaero search and rescue division "initiated necessary actions to start air operations to locate the missing aircraft" at 05:20UTC. By this time Air France was also trying to confirm the flight's position and, over a period of about three hours, the carrier and several other control centres - among them Canarias, Santa Maria, Casablanca, Lisboa, Madrid and Brest - exchanged information in a bid to establish the aircraft's whereabouts. At one stage, the BEA chronology shows, the flight was erroneously reported to have been in contact with Moroccan air traffic control.
Air France and Brest centre informed BEA of the situation shortly after 07:41UTC. Madrid centre issued an 'alert' emergency phase at 08:15UTC and Brest launched a 'distress' phase about 20min later.
Labels: Accident, Agencies, ATC, Investigation
BEA releases interim report on Air France Airbus A330 accident
The French Bureau d'Enquêtes et d'Analyses (BEA) released an interim report based on the initial evidence gathered in the course of the investigation of the June 2 accident involving an Air France A330.
Some of the findings are:
* the meteorological situation was typical of that encountered in the month of June in the inter-tropical convergence zone;
* there were powerful cumulonimbus clusters on the route of AF447. Some of them could have been the centre of some notable turbulence;
* several airplanes that were flying before and after AF 447, at about the same altitude, altered their routes in order to avoid cloud masses;
* twenty-four automatic maintenance messages were received between 02:10 and 02:15 via the ACARS system. These messages show inconsistency between the measured speeds as well as the associated consequences;
* visual examination showed that the airplane was not destroyed in flight; it appears to have struck the surface of the sea in a straight line with high vertical acceleration.
FAA Agrees to Improvements for Pilot Training and Safety Programs
http://www.charterx.com/resources/article.aspx?id=4384
Labels: Agencies, Flight Crew, Training
Friday, 24 July 2009
Jet Pilot in Near Miss Criticized
The man who killed a Danish air traffic controller after his wife and children died in a midair collision has called for the pilot involved in a near miss near Moscow last month to be stripped of his license.
Two Russian passenger jets carrying 300 passengers nearly collided after taking off from Moscow's Vnukovo and Domodedovo airports on April 24. Investigators say the pilot of one of the planes, a Tu-154, inexplicably descended into the path of the other plane, a Boeing 767, and a crash was only averted by a quick-thinking air traffic controller.
"I believe such pilots should not be allowed near a plane at all," said Vitaly Kaloyev, a North Ossetian architect sentenced to 5 1/2 years in a Swiss prison for the killing but released early for good behavior, RIA-Novosti reported.
Kaloyev's wife and two children died when a Tu-154 and a cargo jet collided over southern Germany in 2002 in a crash blamed on the Danish air trffic controller
ttp://www.moscowtimes.ru/article/1010/42/377197.htm
Labels: Various

























